I initially started out the process by reading the
text out loud to myself. It seemed like a logical place to start. Especially
after last Wednesday's class, the text became much more manageable and accessible,
and less of a daunting “how do I deal with these words on paper?” task. I tried
different rates of speed…seeing how fast or slow reading affected the
work. Since we discussed the sense of
urgency last class, I wanted to experiment a little bit with seeing whether or
not urgency could be achieved without spewing the text at a warp-speed. I found it to be a challenge, however I also
found that it was a lot less manic, which almost made it a little bit more
foreboding.
Actually memorizing the text, however, was a
completely different ball game. It was
particularly difficult because I had to grapple with the different rhythmic
patterns of the words on the page. But
after several hours of playing around with different sentence cadences (if you
can call them sentences), it finally clicked.
I found myself using more of my musical senses more
than anything in grappling with this piece. It felt as though each phrase had
its own rhythm, its own musicality, etc.
Some lines were faster than others.
Some were slower than others. I
also found that in trying to take the lines at a quicker pace, it was easier for
me to think about learning them in sort of musical phrases, then put the
phrases together, and smooth out the transition between the phrases. In summation, thinking of “Not I” as a
musical piece without a tune has helped me get into the piece and work with it
a lot easier.
The only obstacles I’ve consistently experienced is
my consistent need to create images in my head to remember the words on the
page, and sometimes there just simply is not an image to be had. Without cue lines, or a through story, it has
made conquering this piece a particular challenge (especially when you’re
dealing with a section in the middle, like me).
No comments:
Post a Comment